Banning Hate Groups: New Legal Powers in Australia
The Power to Outlaw: Analyzing Australia’s New Hate Group Bans
Reflecting on the Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026.
While Australia has previously sought to ban organizations like the Communist Party or criminal motorcycle gangs, these attempts have often faced steep constitutional hurdles. As Professor Anne Twomey explains, the new 2026 proposal introduces a mechanism where the Executive can bypass the courts to declare a group "prohibited."
The "Ministerial Satisfaction" Threshold
Under the proposed law, a group is banned via regulation by the Governor-General based on ministerial advice. The criteria for this advice raise several legal red flags:
- No Conviction Required: The Minister can be satisfied a "hate crime" occurred even if no one has been convicted in a court of law. [00:09:03]
- Retrospective Conduct: The law allows the Minister to consider conduct that happened in the past, even if it was legal at the time it occurred. [00:05:50]
- Vague Harm Definitions: The ban must be deemed "reasonably necessary" to prevent social, economic, psychological, or physical harm—terms the Law Council of Australia has described as unacceptably vague. [00:04:42]
The Risk to Community Groups
The definition of an "organization" is broad, including unincorporated bodies like political parties, unions, or even WhatsApp groups. The bill introduces the concept of "informal membership," which could lead to:
- Guilt by Association: It remains unclear how the conduct of one member is attributed to the group. Could a single post in a Facebook group result in the entire group being prohibited? [00:07:43]
- Procedural Vacuum: The bill explicitly states the Minister is not required to observe procedural fairness when reaching their decision. [00:10:20]
Constitutional Safeguards
Professor Twomey warns that while these laws may target specific "bad" actors today, they create a blueprint for future abuse. If a future government used these powers to target political rivals (the "Party Zed" scenario), the primary defense would be the High Court’s implied freedom of political communication. [00:16:52]
Following the emergency sitting triggered by the Bondi terror attack, a deal has been reached between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley to ensure the passage of the revised hate speech laws.
Key developments from the final agreement include:
- Liberal Support Secured: The Coalition will back the bill after Labor agreed to amendments ensuring "hate preacher" provisions include guest speakers and visiting extremists.
- The "Split" Strategy: As predicted in the analysis above, the contentious anti-racial vilification provisions have been shelved to ensure the "Hate Group" banning powers can pass immediately.
- Oversight Measures: The laws will now be subject to a formal review after two years by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security.
- Targeted Groups: The powers are specifically expected to target neo-Nazi organizations and Islamist groups like Hizb ut-Tahrir.
While the Liberal party has moved to support the bill, the National Party continues to express concerns regarding "unintended consequences" of handing the Minister such broad designation powers, highlighting a potential split in the Coalition's final vote.

No comments:
We Value Your Feedback!
Please take a moment to share a comment or your thoughts using the form.